This vocabulary was created in the FOAF project, based on experience with FOAF, Dublin Core and other early RDF vocabularies. Deployment experience shows that changing namespace URIs is expensive and unrewarding, so this vocabulary provides terms to support in-place evolution of structured data vocabularies. By indicating status at the level of terms rather than vocabularies, dictionary-style, fine grained improvements become easier. Different organizations and parties can agree or disagree on the status of a vocabulary term; however the status published alongside the term may deserve special attention. Future work could include patterns for citing announcements and decisions, or using SKOS to decentralise the extension of the basic status levels. (from artifact)
- Prefix
vs- Keywords
- metadata ontology semantic web
- Links
- Homepage OWL Request Discussion
- Contact
- Missing Contact
- Pattern for Local Unique Identifiers
- Missing LUI pattern
- Example Local Unique Identifier
- term_status Resolve
- Example CURIE
- vs:term_status
- Contributors
-
- submitter Charles Tapley Hoyt 0000-0003-4423-4370 cthoyt
Metaregistry SemWeb Vocab Status ontology
The metaregistry provides mappings between the Semantic Farm and other registries. There are 2 mappings to external registries for this resource with 1 unique external prefixes.
| Registry Name | Registry Metaprefix | External Prefix | Curate |
|---|---|---|---|
LOV
|
lov |
vs
|
|
Zazuko
|
zazuko |
vs
|
RDF Information
When using this resource in RDF, the following URI format should be used:
http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#$1
Providers
A provider turns a local unique identifiers from a resource into a URI. Many providers are also resolvable as URLs (i.e., they can be used in a web browser).
The local unique identifier term_status is used to demonstrate the providers
available for SemWeb Vocab Status ontology. Some providers may use a different example, which is displayed in the table below.
A guide for curating additional providers can be found
here.